The Supreme Court has granted a 5-4 ruling that prevents Michigan from suing to block a casino that is off-reservation. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
The principles casinos that are governing by Native American tribal groups are varied and complex, relying on both federal laws and the compacts signed between states and the tribes that reside within them. This plays out in legal battles across the country, including one that was just settled in the court that is highest for the land.
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled this week that Michigan cannot sue a tribe to stop the opening and operation of A indian casino, as tribal sovereign immunity overrules the state’s legal challenges. The decision was an one that is divisive as the justices had been split 5-4 in support of the Bay Mills Indian Community.
Off-Reservation Casino in mind of Case
The situation revolved around a casino that the Bay Mills tribe built in 2010 about 90 miles south of its reservation, that will be located on Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The tribe had purchased land there with money it received as an ingredient of funds with all the government over allegations which they was not properly paid for land they quit in 19th century treaties.
Since the casino was constructed on off-reservation land, Michigan had argued that its operation was at violation of the state compact and without permission through the state or governments that are federal Continue reading